A heartwarming five minutes of breakfast radio on Gold 104.3

Media item: breakfast radio segment

This page records the media item. The broadcast is the property of its publisher and is not reproduced here, and no participant is identified or quoted.

What follows is general information on teeth, self-esteem and body image — a subject dental marketing handles badly, and one that deserves a careful rather than a flattering treatment.

The honest starting point

Appearance affects how people feel, and teeth are part of appearance. Research across several countries has found associations between visible dental problems and lower self-rated confidence, reluctance to smile in photographs, and avoidance of social and job-interview situations. That is real and it is not vanity.

It is also frequently overstated in advertising, and the overstatement causes harm. Two things are true at once:

For some people, dental treatment produces a genuine and lasting improvement in how they feel — particularly where there is visible decay, missing front teeth, or trauma damage.
For others, changing the teeth changes nothing about the underlying distress, because the distress was never really located there.

Distinguishing between those two situations before treatment is a clinical responsibility, not an optional courtesy.

Where dental treatment genuinely helps

Missing anterior teeth, which affect speech and eating as well as appearance.
Untreated decay and infection, where pain, odour and embarrassment compound each other and often cause people to withdraw from care entirely.
Trauma damage, especially in adolescents.
Severe erosion or developmental conditions such as amelogenesis or dentinogenesis imperfecta, or fluorosis.
Function that has been lost — the ability to eat in company matters enormously and is chronically underrated.

In these cases treatment restores something that was lost. That is different from creating something that was never there.

Where it does not, and where caution is owed

Body dysmorphic disorder is a recognised psychiatric condition in which a person is preoccupied with a perceived flaw that others barely notice. It is more common among people seeking cosmetic procedures than in the general population, and cosmetic treatment characteristically does not relieve it — dissatisfaction typically returns, often relocated to another feature.

Warning signs that a cosmetic request may not be what it appears:

A concern disproportionate to what is clinically visible.
Repeated previous cosmetic treatment with persistent dissatisfaction.
Precise, unattainable specifications drawn from filtered photographs.
An expectation that the treatment will change a relationship, a job outcome or a life circumstance.
Significant distress or social avoidance.

The right response is not to refuse and move on. It is to slow down, decline irreversible treatment for the time being, and offer a referral for psychological assessment — through a general practitioner — without implying that the person is not to be believed.

Under the Dental Board's Code of Conduct and section 133 of the National Law, a practitioner must not encourage unnecessary treatment or create an unreasonable expectation of benefit. ‘This will change your life’ is not a claim dentistry is entitled to make. What a consent conversation should actually cover is set out separately.

Filters, and what they have done to expectations

A specific modern problem worth naming.

Photographic filters routinely whiten and straighten teeth, and they do so beyond anything achievable in a real mouth. People increasingly arrive with an edited image of their own face as the target. That target does not exist, and treatment planned towards it ends in disappointment however well it is executed.

The related trap is uniformity. Natural teeth are not identical, not perfectly aligned, and not the same shade top to bottom. Teeth that photograph as flawlessly white and uniform read as artificial in person, and a good result is usually one nobody identifies as dental work.

The conservative-first principle

If appearance is the concern, the order of operations matters and it is routinely reversed:

Health first. Treat decay and gum disease. Cosmetic work over active disease fails.
Cleaning and stain removal, which alone resolves a proportion of complaints.
Whitening, which is reversible in the sense that it removes no tooth structure.
Orthodontics, which moves the teeth you already have rather than cutting them down. For alignment concerns this is almost always the more conservative option, and it is very often skipped in favour of veneers.
Composite bonding, which is additive and repairable.
Veneers and crowns last, because preparation is irreversible and commits you to lifelong maintenance and eventual replacement.

Ask for a diagnostic mock-up before anything irreversible. Seeing the proposed shape in your own mouth, and living with it for a few days, is the single most useful safeguard available — and it costs a fraction of the treatment.

For parents

Children notice teeth, and teasing about teeth is common and consequential. The useful interventions are early — preventing decay in front teeth, managing trauma promptly, and orthodontic assessment at the right developmental stage rather than the earliest possible one. Cosmetic treatment on developing teeth is rarely appropriate, and pulp chambers in young permanent teeth are large, which makes preparation for veneers particularly damaging.

Common questions

I have avoided the dentist for years because of how my teeth look. How common is that, and does avoiding actually make it worse?

Common, and yes — and there is Australian data on both halves of that.

Armfield and colleagues analysed a national Australian survey of 6,112 adults aged 16 and over and found that 11.9 per cent answered ‘yes, very' when asked whether they were afraid of going to the dentist. Among that group, 43.9 per cent had last attended more than two years ago, against roughly 27 to 29 per cent of those who were not afraid.

The second half is the part worth knowing before you put it off another year. The same study described a ‘vicious cycle' profile — delayed visiting, dental problems, and treatment sought only once symptoms appear. 29.2 per cent of those who were very afraid fitted that profile, compared with 11.6 per cent of people with no dental fear, with the odds of fitting it about 3.33 times higher (95% CI 2.67 to 4.15) in the very fearful group.

The mechanism is not mysterious and it is not a character failing. Waiting converts problems that would have been small into problems that need more treatment, and more treatment is exactly what the fear is about. Each cycle makes the next visit harder to face and more likely to involve the thing you were dreading. That data is from 2007, so treat the percentages as of their time, but the shape of the finding is the point: avoidance is self-reinforcing, and the cheapest moment to break it is always now rather than later.

What actually reduces dental anxiety, and what has been oversold?

A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials, published in the Journal of Anxiety Disorders, is the most careful answer available — and several popular measures come out badly.

What has support. Psychological therapy is the intervention with the strongest signal: pooled across 8 trials and 411 participants, psychotherapies (cognitive behavioural therapy and EMDR) reduced longer-standing dental anxiety with a standardised mean difference of −0.80 (95% CI −1.00 to −0.59), though the review rated the certainty low and a sensitivity analysis excluding an outlier brought it to −0.48 (−0.72 to −0.24). Hypnosis, in patients having extractions, showed −0.31 (−0.56 to −0.05) at moderate certainty.

One honest caution about a figure you will see quoted. The often-repeated ‘CBT, −0.65, moderate certainty' result rests on just two trials and 98 participants after an outlier and all waitlist-controlled trials were excluded; the primary analysis of all five trials and 419 participants gave −0.71 with a confidence interval running from −1.35 to −0.08, at low certainty and with very high heterogeneity. It is a real signal, not a settled effect size.

What did not reach significance. Background music, across 13 trials and 923 participants, gave −0.25 (−0.49 to 0.01). Lavender aromatherapy, across 3 trials and 522 participants, gave −0.39 (−0.86 to 0.08) — not significant. Acupuncture against sham, across 3 trials and 195 participants, gave −0.04 (−0.32 to 0.24) — not significant, at moderate certainty. Virtual-reality distraction fared no better in this analysis.

None of that means a practice should stop offering headphones, and none of it means music does not help you. It means those measures are comfort rather than treatment, and if anxiety is the thing keeping you out of the chair, the evidence points towards psychological therapy through your general practitioner rather than towards a playlist. If you would like to talk through what is available first, the dental anxiety page sets out the practice's approach, and how can I ease my anxiety about visiting the dentist? covers the practical side.

Is there anything that genuinely helps with the needle, or is that just reassurance?

Topical numbing gel has real but narrower evidence than it is usually given credit for, and knowing the limit makes the rest of the conversation more useful.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials found that topical anaesthetic produced a statistically significant reduction in the pain of needle puncture in the upper jaw — both on the cheek side (P = 0.0002) and on the palate (P = 0.005). Its conclusion was that topical anaesthetics ‘only relieve pain during needle puncture and in the maxilla'. There was no demonstrated effect on the pain of the anaesthetic solution going in, and no statistically significant effect in the lower jaw.

So the realistic expectation is that gel takes the edge off the initial prick on an upper tooth, and does less than that elsewhere. What tends to matter more is everything around it: saying beforehand that the needle is the part you dread, agreeing a stop signal and having it honoured, and being told what is happening rather than surprised by it. Those are requests you are entitled to make, and a practitioner who takes them seriously is doing the part of the job the gel cannot.

After years away, what does the first appointment back actually have to involve?

Less than most people assume, and that is worth knowing in advance because the imagined version is usually worse than the real one.

A first visit back can reasonably be a conversation and a look — history, an examination, and a plan — with no treatment done on the day. Asking for that when you book is a normal request, not an awkward one. It also breaks the problem into two decisions: finding out where things stand, and then deciding what to do about it. Those are much easier apart than together.

Two things to say out loud at that appointment, because neither will be guessed. Say how long it has been and why, so nobody fills the gap with the wrong explanation. And ask for the findings to be given to you in order of urgency — what needs doing now, what can wait, and what is being watched — along with an itemised written estimate. Fear feeds on open-endedness, and a list with a sequence on it is smaller than an unknown.

If it is the appearance of your teeth rather than the treatment that has kept you away, the order set out above still applies: health first, then cleaning, then the least invasive option that achieves what you want. A great deal of what people expect to need veneers for turns out not to.

Practical details

Smile Solutions, Level 1, 220 Collins Street, Manchester Unity Building, Melbourne VIC 3000. Phone 13 13 96, or theteam@smilesolutions.com.au. Monday–Friday 8.00am–6.00pm, Saturday 8.30am–1.30pm, Sunday by appointment.

Every practitioner's registration can be verified free on the AHPRA public register at ahpra.gov.au.

This page records a media item; third-party broadcast content is not reproduced. The material above is general information, not clinical or psychological advice. No dental treatment is represented as improving wellbeing, confidence or life outcomes, and suitability can only be assessed individually. If you are distressed about your appearance, speak with your general practitioner. Lifeline 13 11 14; Beyond Blue 1300 22 4636.

Smile Solutions trades under ABN 28 193 514 103.